climate confusion

{condemn oil producers?OR? condemn Nyahoo politics?}
..

Huge hidden ocean under Xinjiang's Tarim basin larger than all Great Lakes combined

The ocean acts as a major carbon sink, sucking up CO2 and preventing even greater climate change
PUBLISHED : Thursday, 30 July, 2015, 5:42pm
UPDATED : Thursday, 30 July, 2015, 5:42pm
There could be an “ocean” hidden under one of the driest areas on Earth, according to a breakthrough discovery by Chinese scientists.
The amount of salt water beneath the Tarim basin in Xinjiang could be equivalent to ten times the water of all five Great Lakes in the United States.
“This is a terrifying amount of water,” said professor Li Yan, who led the study at the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography in Urumqi.
“Never before have people dared to imagine so much water under the sand. Our definition of desert may have to change,” he said.
The Tarim is the world’s largest landlocked basin and home to Taklimakan, the largest desert in China. The basin is known for its rich oil reserves, but to access them requires large amounts of water.
For a long time scientists had suspected that melt water from high mountains nearby had sipped beneath the basin, but the exact amount of water reserves there remained unknown.
Precise estimates are difficult because surface water in the region, such as seasonal rivers and lakes appear at random times in inconsistent locations, making direct measurement impossible.
Li’s team stumbled on the discovery by accident.
“We were after carbon, not water,” he said.
Xinjiang contains major oil and gas reserves. Photo: Reuters
Greenhouse gas carbon dioxide can be absorbed in certain regions known as "carbon sinks", such as forests and oceans. Locating these sinks may help scientists better understand climate change.
Around ten years ago, Li’s team discovered large amounts of carbon dioxide disappearing in Tarim, with no explanation over where it could be going.
In a paper in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, Li’s team reported that there could be a large amount of water under Earth's largest deserts which serve as carbon sinks as important as forests and oceans.
Under the Tarim desert, over a depth stretching thousands of metres, exists an enormous amount of saline water fll of carbon dioxide, they found.
The team obtained deep underground water samples from nearly 200 locations across the desert. By measuring the amount of carbon dioxide in these samples, and comparing them to the carbon dioxide in melt water, the scientists were able to calculate how much water had flown into the basin.
“Our estimate is a conservative figure. The actual amount could be larger,” Li said.
Melt water has been used by people in Xinjiang for agricultural irrigation for thousands of years.
The soil of farmland in the region is alkaline, helping the dissolving of carbon dioxide into the water. By dating the age of the carbon Li's team "recorded a jump of 'carbon sinking' after the opening of the ancient Silk Road more than two thousand years ago."
“CCS [carbon capture and storage] is a 21st century idea, but our ancestors may have been doing it unconsciously for thousands of years," he said.
However, Li emphasised that the "ocean" under Tarim would not be much immediate use for Xinjiang's economic development.
The water is not just salty, but contains a large amount of carbon dioxide. “It’s like a can of coke. If it is opened all the greenhouse gas will escape into the atmosphere,” he said.
The biggest question now is whether similar “oceans” can be also be found under other large deserts, such as Sahara. Li said they would work with research teams around the world to find out the answer.
The chance of water under these deserts is high because the amount of carbon these “oceans” carried could reach a trillion tonnes, which matches the amount of “missing carbon” on the planet, according to Li's team's calculations.



The confounding case of the missing carbon




For several decades, scientists have been searching for about a billion tons of carbon dioxide generated from the burning of fossil fuels.
Of the roughly 11 billion tons of carbon produced each year, it has been estimated that more than 5 billion remains in the atmosphere. Another 3 billion is stored in the oceans. The rest of it, it seems, is sequestered in tropical and northern forests, but there's some -- perhaps a billion tons' worth, perhaps even more -- that can't quite be accounted for.
Scientists have struggled to explain the "missing carbon sink," with some arguing it's actually in the forests after all, and others believing it's elsewhere.
Now, an international team from the United States and China is suggesting there is another possible repository for some of this missing carbon: below the deserts of the world.
In a paper in the Geophysical Research Letters, a journal of the American Geophysical Union, the scientists contend that massive aquifers underneath deserts could hold more carbon than all the plants on land. Thanks to agriculture in these areas, they estimated these underground deserts aquifers are storing 14 times more carbon every year than previously thought.



researchers-copy.jpg
Researchers gathered groundwater flowing under the desert sands. The amount of carbon carried by this underground flow increased quickly when the Silk Road, which opened the region to farming, began 2,000 years ago.
Yan Li
"The carbon is stored in these geological structures covered by thick layers of sand, and it may never return to the atmosphere," said Yan Li, a desert biogeochemist with the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Urumqi, Xinjiang, and lead author on the study. "It is basically a one-way trip."
The idea of deserts as carbon sinks has been suggested in the past. Some scientists have argued that the carbon was taken up by desert plants and transferred deep into the root system where it remains. But that was controversial due to the lack of plants and the poor state of soils.
To test their aquifer theory, the authors of the new research examined the flow of water through the Tarim Basin, a Venezuela-sized valley in China's Xinjiang region. Farmers on the edge of the desert are supported by water draining from rivers in the surrounding mountains.
They found a complex process, whereby the amount of carbon dioxide dissolved in the water doubles as it filters through irrigated fields. They also found that carbon dioxide in the air was being absorbed by the desert crops through the plant's roots and that microbes add carbon dioxide to the soil when they break down sugars in the dirt.
Although this process of carbon burial occurs naturally, the scientists estimate that the amount of carbon disappearing under the Tarim Desert each year is almost 12 times higher because of agriculture. The amount entering the Tarim Desert increased significantly about 2,000 years ago, when the Silk Road opened and farming began to flourish.
After the carbon-rich water flows down into the aquifer near the farms and rivers, it moves sideways toward the middle of the desert, a process that takes roughly 10,000 years.
And over its history, the desert has been a huge and long standing carbon sink. The study's authors estimate that over its lifetime, the desert has held an aggregate 22 billion tons of carbon, dissolved in an aquifer that contains roughly 10 times the amount of water held in the Great Lakes.
R.A. Houghton, a co-author on the study from the Woods Hole Research Center whose expertise is in land use and carbon cycles, said the findings could help produce better climate models into the future and force scientists to rethink the idea that increased emissions were leading to greater growth rates in forest, and thus, more carbon being stored in them.
"If you are proposing a mechanism to explain the carbon sink, you have to have a process that is increasing over time," Houghton said. "So, what is neat about this study is that they propose this increasing sink in these desert brines is due to agriculture. The sink is getting bigger as we irrigate."
While the study could help solve the mystery of the missing carbon, Houghton warned against using the findings to justify increased farming in arid regions as a benefit to the climate.
"Many places in the world are drawing water from clean aquifers. It's not being replaced," Houghton said. "So once it is used up, what do you do to keep all that land watered?"

No comments:

Post a Comment