Global warming will destroy half of common plants by century end: Study
RELATED
NEW DELHI: More than half of common plants
and one third of the animals could see a dramatic decline this century
due to climate change, according to research published today in the
journal Nature Climate Change.
Researchers from the University of East Anglia looked at 50,000 globally widespread and common species and found that more than one half of the plants and one third of the animals will lose more than half of their climatic range by 2080 if nothing is done to reduce the amount of global warming and slow it down.
"While there has been much research on the effect of climate change on rare and endangered species, little has been known about how an increase in global temperature will affect more common species," Dr Rachel Warren from UEA's School of Environmental Sciences said in a statement.
Plants, reptiles and particularly amphibians are expected to be at highest risk. Sub-Saharan Africa, Central America, Amazonia and Australia would lose the most species of plants and animals. And a major loss of plant species is projected for North Africa, Central Asia and South-eastern Europe.
"We looked at the effect of rising global temperatures, but other symptoms of climate change such as extreme weather events, pests, and diseases mean that our estimates are probably conservative. Animals in particular may decline more as our predictions will be compounded by a loss of food from plants," Warren said.
"There will also be a knock-on effect for humans because these species are important for things like water and air purification, flood control, nutrient cycling, and eco-tourism," she added.
But acting quickly to mitigate climate change could reduce losses by 60 per cent and buy an additional 40 years for species to adapt. This is because this mitigation would slow and then stop global temperatures from rising by more than two degrees Celsius relative to pre-industrial times (1765). Without this mitigation, global temperatures could rise by 4 degrees Celsius by 2100.
"The good news is that our research provides crucial new evidence of how swift action to reduce CO2 and other greenhouse gases can prevent the biodiversity loss by reducing the amount of global warming to 2 degrees Celsius rather than 4 degrees. This would also buy time -- up to four decades -- for plants and animals to adapt to the remaining 2 degrees of climate change," Warren said.
The research team quantified the benefits of acting now to mitigate climate change and found that up to 60 per cent of the projected climatic range loss for biodiversity can be avoided.
Researchers from the University of East Anglia looked at 50,000 globally widespread and common species and found that more than one half of the plants and one third of the animals will lose more than half of their climatic range by 2080 if nothing is done to reduce the amount of global warming and slow it down.
"While there has been much research on the effect of climate change on rare and endangered species, little has been known about how an increase in global temperature will affect more common species," Dr Rachel Warren from UEA's School of Environmental Sciences said in a statement.
Plants, reptiles and particularly amphibians are expected to be at highest risk. Sub-Saharan Africa, Central America, Amazonia and Australia would lose the most species of plants and animals. And a major loss of plant species is projected for North Africa, Central Asia and South-eastern Europe.
"We looked at the effect of rising global temperatures, but other symptoms of climate change such as extreme weather events, pests, and diseases mean that our estimates are probably conservative. Animals in particular may decline more as our predictions will be compounded by a loss of food from plants," Warren said.
"There will also be a knock-on effect for humans because these species are important for things like water and air purification, flood control, nutrient cycling, and eco-tourism," she added.
But acting quickly to mitigate climate change could reduce losses by 60 per cent and buy an additional 40 years for species to adapt. This is because this mitigation would slow and then stop global temperatures from rising by more than two degrees Celsius relative to pre-industrial times (1765). Without this mitigation, global temperatures could rise by 4 degrees Celsius by 2100.
"The good news is that our research provides crucial new evidence of how swift action to reduce CO2 and other greenhouse gases can prevent the biodiversity loss by reducing the amount of global warming to 2 degrees Celsius rather than 4 degrees. This would also buy time -- up to four decades -- for plants and animals to adapt to the remaining 2 degrees of climate change," Warren said.
The research team quantified the benefits of acting now to mitigate climate change and found that up to 60 per cent of the projected climatic range loss for biodiversity can be avoided.
Global Warming Has Stopped"? How to Fool People Using "Cherry ...
www.forbes.com/.../global-warming-has-stopped-how-to-fool-people-usi...Feb 5, 2012 – The problem with this argument is that it is false: global warming has not .... The claim by skeptics is that the earth hasn't warmed since 1998, ...
What has global warming done since 1998? - Skeptical Science
www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-stopped-in-1998-intermediat...Jan 10, 2013 – The planet has continued to accumulate heat since 1998 - global warming is still happening. Nevertheless, surface temperatures show much ...
global surface temperatures did not rise between 1998 and 2008 ...
wattsupwiththat.com/.../a-peer-reviewed-admission-that-global-surface-te...Jul 4, 2011 – They say that the global temperature has increased since then. ... cyclic warming) but even that did not raise temperatures above 1998. .... coming: the world is cooling because of the burning of fossil fuels and to stop it, we ...
No, Global Warming Hasn't 'Stopped' : Discovery News
news.discovery.com/.../global-warming/no-global-warming-hasnt-stoppe...Oct 17, 2012 – A newspaper article claims global warming has 'stopped'. ... that there has been no warming since 1997 or 1998 is an oft-repeated one. We've ...
There IS a problem with global warming... it stopped in 1998 ...
www.telegraph.co.uk › Comment › Personal ViewApr 9, 2006 – For many years now, human-caused climate change has been ... In response to these facts, a global warming devotee will chuckle and say ... They have long appreciated - ever since the early 1990s, when the global warming ...
Global warming: Met Office releases revised global temperature ...
www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Global-warming-Met-Office-releases-revised-gl...Jan 8, 2013 – Global warming has STALLED since 1998: Met Office admits Earth's ... who said it would be wrong to interpret that warming had stopped.
Climate myths: Global warming stopped in 1998 - environment - 15 ...
www.newscientist.com/.../dn14527-climate-myths-global-warming-stopp...Aug 15, 2008 – In fact, the planet as a whole has warmed since 1998, sometimes even in ... The record warmth of 1998 was not due to a sudden spurt in global ...
Global warming: has the rise in temperatures 'paused'? - The Guardian
www.guardian.co.uk › Environment › The eco audit with Leo HickmanJan 10, 2013 – The "global warming has stopped" line from climate sceptics has ... Ben Santer tackling the "myth" of there being no warming since 1998.
Has global warming stopped? | Carbon Brief
www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/05/has-global-warming-stoppedMay 10, 2011 – The argument that global warming has stopped is typified by this ... data on 2010 confirms that since 1998 there has been no overall warming…
ClimateWatch Magazine » Short-term Cooling on a Warming Planet
www.climatewatch.noaa.gov/.../short-term-cooling-on-a-warming-planetDec 31, 2009 – Short-term Cooling on a Warming Planet ... they point to declining te
No comments:
Post a Comment